Labour’s reforms of the NHS are reformations in the same sense that a piece of paper is reformed by being shredded. They are reforms in the same way that a sinner is reformed by being burnt at the stake.
The language of reform has been misappropriated so that “change” comes to mean “reform” This linguistic slip has enabled a Labour government to unleash its domestic version of Operation Shock and Awe on the NHS and pass it off as “improvement.” All opposition to the so called improvement must be crushed as “a force of conservatism” or as “misinformed and badly educated”
I am well educated and I am fed up of Chairman Patsy’s uplifting little homilies. I would love the gales of creative destruction to blow through the Department of Health and flatten it.
I wish to reclaim the English language as a tool for direct communication and so expose the travesty of targets and activity that currently masquerades as thought and action. I have listened to Professor David Hunter describe the current NHS changes as “Incoherent, back to front, contradictory” at a meeting In Bradford in November 2005. Things don’t look any better now,
as the Lancet describes.
The biggest failure of this new Labour Government on health has been its inability or unwillingness to generate any coherent thinking about what is either needed or wanted from a healthcare system. The word that must not be named here of course is RATIONING
The justification for the NHS is its equity and its universal population coverage. Also that it controls overall health expenditure within the economy. The Americans have low equity, high cost, non-universal medicine that is good if you have enough insurance dollars behind you.
The difficulty with the NHS is that its laudable equity is equally bad, rather than equally good, for everyone. The current talk about high quality, dependable local services is a joke as there is no real competition to the NHS, so no real comparison is possible. The distorted version of competition that the government and its pals in McKinsey’s and other management consultancies have dreamt up bears the same relation to market competition as a gargoyle does to a portrait.
David Craig describes how it’s all been done in his useful book and the
review here is a good summary.
I suspect patients would be realistic if told that NHS resources are finite, and cannot provide everything for everyone. Already the NHS has given up on long term care of the elderly, a lot of optician and dental work, much chiropody, most infertility treatment and most plastic surgery. People seem to have adapted to this, although the Scots have gone back to providing long term care for their old folk without trying to separate out the nursing from other care needs. (The current distinction English social service department have to draw)
Most patients want accessible services, good communication with staff and good follow through on problems. They do not like inaccessible services, long waits, bad communication, having to repeat themselves multiple times, seeing a different doctor each time. As a GP I try to cater to these needs but everything in the NHS is making it harder for me to achieve and deliver what patients want.
Money goes not into more GPs, or better premises but into new stand apart facilities whilst existing NHS infrastructure is run down and staff laid off. The PCTs grow ever larger (back into the district health authorities that they started from, progress being a circular concept in the NHS) and ever more managers are recruited, but they don’t address the fundamental problems of lack of space and lack of real workers. They get in sound good initiatives like community matrons but block GPs getting extra practice nurses. They can get “five a day” health promotion workers but they can’t get dentists. Harriet Sergeant exposes the problem well here.
The manager working for £40K wonders why he cannot get radiographers on £25K in central London.
The current NHS changes are a disaster waiting to happen and they deserve opposition. They are no way in which to run any health service sensibly. As at present set up they will bring misery to patients and staff, and Labour politicians deserve to get it in the neck from their voters.
Whether the Tories can do any better remains to be seen.
However I can state with confidence the view that this current government is a disaster to the NHS and deserves evicting from office as soon as possible, on grounds of its NHS record alone.
The fact that teachers tell me that schools are just as bad only adds to the feeling of terminal incompetence that surrounds the end of this government.
And let’s not ask the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan how they feel about things.
Monday, October 30, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)









35 comments:
Dr Blue - there was not a single well placed "fuck" in any of that excellent piece.
Could you occasionally drop in the odd "bastard, fuck, etc" as I get vicarious catharsis from them.
Ta
Snipe,
Dr Blue is one of the more intellectual members of the Dr Rant team.
I don't think I've actually ever heard him use the f-word.
But I'm sure Frank Rant can't be far off with a fix for all us scatologists.
I do agree that it would be helpful if policymakers would be clearer as to which treatments were covered under the NHS and specify those that were excluded. Then for the services that are covered they should produce a world-class service that they would have no compunction using themselves. In fact I’ve asked all MPs to always use the NHS. The petition organised by OurPetition.org requests that ‘elected representatives of all UK political parties voluntarily refrain from self-paid or insurance-paid medical care treatment'. 52 MPs that have already signed the 'acid test' petition of MP support. There can be no greater message of support to those delivering our healthcare than for policymakers to always use the NHS themselves. You can see a full list of signatories and/or sign the health petition at www.ourpetition.org. By signing, you help Great Britain to build a world-class NHS.
Fantastic post, Dr. Blue.
Realistically, I suppose nothing will happen in the short term. Patsy is too closely aligned to Tony Blair. She will simply sit on her hands and juggle her in-tray for the remainder of her tenure. The next PM will reward her with a peerage for her "services". She can then enjoy her retirement in a Tuscan villa.
We can only hope that her successor ( and the policy makers of the opposition parties ) take the time to read posts like this one.
Dr Sniper: I agree with Dr Pink, in that Dr Blue was remarkably...restrained in his post. Came as quite a surprise to me too to actually read a Dr Rant post without being unable to count the number of f-words on one hand. (Oh, and btw--agree with potentilla's comment on NHS Blog Doc--that is a great name).
Dr Blue: That last part of your post caught me. I was about to post my usual "hear hear!" complete-agreement-with-your-views-accompanied-by-pitchfork-waving comment, then I saw that you've considered other professions too. Yep, teachers agree it's not much better, and we all know how David Copperfield feels about the police force.
Labour is already out here in Cambridge, and I hope it stays that way.
Whatever happened to the slogan "the NHS is safe in our hands"? Maybe it should be resurrected, or its antithesis.
I have a lot of sympathy but having used health services in Lithuania and Greece (not shining models of anything) I am regularly infuriated by the way the NHS is run medically, as well as managerially.
"suspect patients would be realistic": ah, bless.
Does Dr Blue swear?
The old BMJ obituraries put it something like this, usually about a famous surgeon. "Despite his rise to the heights of the profession his language sometimes revealed his humble origins. Many a theatre sister could testify that he retained fully his grasp of the vernacular...."
This euphemism translates as, "The old bugger swore a lot"
Actually I went to a very expensive school to learn my grasp of the vernacular. My dad thought he'd got ever such a good bargain.
Great article! Thanks.
Thanks for interesting article.
Nice Blog!
Thank You! Very interesting article. Do you can write anything else about it?
Very interesting site. Blog is very good. I am happy that I think the same!
Excellent website. Good work. Very useful. I will bookmark!
S73H7K Very good blog! Thanks!
JUjPvn Good job!
Nice Article.
Nice Article.
Thanks to author.
Please write anything else!
actually, that's brilliant. Thank you. I'm going to pass that on to a couple of people.
Wonderful blog.
Hello all!
actually, that's brilliant. Thank you. I'm going to pass that on to a couple of people.
Please write anything else!
58H6fR write more, thanks.
Good job!
Wonderful blog.
Magnific!
Magnific!
Thanks to author.
Nice Article.
Hello all!
actually, that's brilliant. Thank you. I'm going to pass that on to a couple of people.
Nice Article.
Post a Comment