
The NHS needs less of those who are so keen to talk, and more of those who are keen to do.
If you live by the sword, then you should have to die by the sword; unfortunately the makers of the Medical Training Application Service (MTAS) do not seem to be aware of this rather pertinent saying.
For those of you that have been on another planet and have missed the MTAS debacle, here’s a quick run down: MTAS, or the medical training application system, is the creation of a few rather mentally challenged individuals who came up with the idea of MMC (modernizing medical careers). The big idea behind it was to centralize all job applications for junior doctors onto a big computer, so that all juniors would apply using the same application forms and at the same time. The precise reasons for destroying a perfectly decent system have not been revealed as yet, it has been hard so far to extract any hard information from those in control due to an incessant flow of shiny websites and propaganda material.
So gone is the old system that used a strange tool known as the curriculum vitae, and in is the new system that is made up of a rather large amount of ‘competency’ based questions. My heart skips a beat when I hear the word ‘competency’, usually because it heralds a large avalanche of subsequent bullshit when used by someone from the medical establishment. What do competency based questions consist of, aside from utter bullshit? Not much is the answer, and indeed the answers to these questions coincidentally typically consist of rather high grade bullshit too.
Why on earth is a reliable and solid selection tool being replaced with something that resembles a steaming pile of faeces? I have my suspicions. The scientific evidence certainly gives MTAS absolutely fuck all to fall back on. There is a precise sum total of zero evidence that demonstrates ‘competency’ based questions in application forms to be of any use in selecting between medical candidates. There was one Australian study done where they found that adding a bit of competency based waffle onto your CV was beneficial to the candidate’s chances of achieving selection, but that is the sum total of the evidence behind the MTAS application form. I am merely focusing on MTAS’ most glaring fault, which is its complete lack of ability to effectively differentiate between candidates; however I will have to leave the other billions of MTAS problems for another very long rainy day.
Thanks to the MTAS application form, we now have a rather large number of brilliant doctors left with no interviews at all. Many of these docs would have walked into interviews in the old system because they had worked hard, won prizes, passed extra exams, done extra courses and had generally demonstrated a bit more motivation than the other candidates. Thanks to the MTAS application form, these achievements count for virtually nothing compared to the inane drivel that gets inserted in the competency slots. That’s not the end of the lunacy either, short listers cannot see where candidates went to university and they cannot see where they have worked. Welcome to the brave new world of NHS job applications where all useful information is withheld or discounted, while what counts is your ability to bullshit, lie and even cheat.
MTAS really is going to do wonders for our health system, who thought of this wonderful idea of forcing some of the best young trainees abroad while replacing them with eloquent manure merchants? The same people that came up with MMC and competency based learning, that’s who. These cads have one hell of a lot to answer for, and it’s about time they were forced out into the open to face the music.
I’d hedge my bets that there are a fair few medical educationalists and educational psychologists involved in this piss poor pantomime. These kind of people are rather fond of wasting thousands of pounds researching how best to arrange tables and then working out how best to bore their victims to tears with nonsensical pretentious psychobabble. There are also some rather powerful people involved, who skillfully manipulate the scientific process to spread their deadly disease.
The NHS needs less of those who are so keen to talk, and more of those who are keen to do. There are encouraging signs that the medical masses have had enough of this meddling, and that they will not take any more. The people who have brought about these catastrophes will only listen if they are forced to listen, so this is what will have to be done. MTAS needs to be rammed vigorously down its creators' gobs, and it must be lodged so firmly that there is simply no chance of any regurgitation.
35 comments:
I think the reason for MTAS is very clear: those in charge want to create run-through training, so that after medical school a generation of doctors will be trained to specialist level within a fixed (shorter) period of time.
I have two problems with this:
1. The rationale is fundamentally wrong. One cannot select specialty so early on in training. It is impossible to distinguish between final year students - they are "all" high-achievers, all have all the ticks in the right boxes, and the only way of distinguishing them is via (unvalidated and unproven) creative writing skills.
The only decent way of distinguishing the best from the worst is after at least two or years years of postgraduate education, and even then its difficult. The old system created a tier of SHOs (Senior house officers) who all competed for jobs at the next level. This led to fierce competition and only the best got through, often after spending four years doing basic medical training, and spending time in research.
2. It has been executed extremely badly. It has been rushed through without decent piloting, without decent consultation and without any decent management.
Workforce planning is really really difficult. I don't see any problem in accepting that fact. I don't have any easy answers, but this Government has made it very difficult for Trusts to predict their income even in the short-term, so that medium- to long- term plans, including staffing are very very difficult. It is now impossible to know how many consultant jobs will be required in a few years time, so that the very idea of "run-through" training is broken.
I'm astonished that the Royal Colleges appear to have been mute on the subject, and don't know why they have eschewed their responsibility over the matter of doctor's training in this country. This will reflect extremely badly on them for many years to come.
MTAS/MMC is symptomatic of the obsessive tinkering that has blighted the NHS for years.
These tinker-fests are inevitably preceded by reassuring phrases such as 'modernising' or 'reconfiguration' or 'streamlining'.
Of course, the cost of implementing these endless and circular changes far outweighs any sustained financial or clinical gain.
Paradoxically I suspect that most of the front line storm troopers actually want the NHS to work.
One can only conclude that the dabblers - who are many times removed from direct patient contact - are simply hellbent on bringing us all to our knees.
I mean what other explanation can there be ?
On the balance of probabilities I think they will succeed in their Machiavellian project.
A&E Charge Nurse
Can I suggest that everyone who is outraged by this bombards their MPs with a demand that they sign up to EDM, (early day motion) 737. which reads "that this House shares the concern of Remedy UK that poor workforce planning may result in more than 6000 experienced junior doctors being unemployed in August;deplores the rushed implementation of the Modernising Medical Careers programme,which is resulting in anxiety and disillusionment in the medical community and calls for an urgent review of the division of training posts to ensure that £1.5 billion worth of medical training is not lost to the NHS"
This has been raised by Dr Ian Gibson who is a Labour MP and a scientist.
So far 53 MPs have signed. If about 300 get their names down, it will trigger a debate on the floor of the House.
It is simple to contact your MP just follow the links on They Work For You.com. This has the advantage that a) you don't need a stamp and b) they keep a record of your letter and enquire if you have got a satisfactory reply.
E mail a letter to your local paper, I've done Bradford,Huddersfield,Barnsley and the Yorkshire Post oh and Halifax by snail mail.
Let's get this all out in the open, it is not just going to affect the juniors, but all patients who use the NHS not only for now, but way into the future.
I've emailed my MP asking him to sign the EDM.
Well Done.
But the whole scheme makes perfect bureaucratic sense. This is exactly how govt officials do things. They are fulfilling their official duties: to administer & manage. If they didn't do this, what else could they do? Officials too have to fill out reports on what action they've taken. And the taxes are still spent under the right head: the NHS.
Does anyone else feel like the MTAS is on a mission to destroy their whole life? The government can kiss my MTAS.
Good design!
Thanks for interesting article.
I like articles like this. Thanks!
Well done. Keep up the great work. Best regards!
I like it a lot! Nice site, I will bookmark!
Thanks to author! I like articles like this, very interesting.
OkyXoj Very good blog! Thanks!
t2pcVq Good job!
actually, that's brilliant. Thank you. I'm going to pass that on to a couple of people.
Nice Article.
Good job!
Good job!
Nice Article.
Good job!
Magnific!
actually, that's brilliant. Thank you. I'm going to pass that on to a couple of people.
ZacKez write more, thanks.
Please write anything else!
Good job!
Thanks to author.
Nice Article.
Good job!
Thanks to author.
Hello all!
Please write anything else!
actually, that's brilliant. Thank you. I'm going to pass that on to a couple of people.
Omgea Replica Watches
Oris Replica Watches
Panerai Replica Watches
Patek Philippe Replica
Rado Replica Watches
Swiss Chanel Ceramic Watch
Tissot Replica Watches
Ulysse Nardin Replica
Vacheron Constantin Replica
Breitling Watches Replica
Bvlgari Watches Replica
Cartier Watches Replica
Chanel Watches Replica
Gucci Watches Replica
IWC Watches Replica
Longines Watches Replica
Louis Vuitton Watches Replica
Omgea Watches Replica
Oris Watches Replica
Panerai Watches Replica
Patek Philippe Watches Replica
Rado Watches Replica
Rolex Ladies Watches Replica
Swiss Chanel Ceramic Replica
Tag Heuer Watches Replica
Tissot Watches Replica
Ulysse Nardin Watches Replica
replica Louis Vuitton handbags
swiss replica watches
gift watch
watches gift
luxury watches
louis vuitton handbags
Replica watches
Replica Gucci
Replica Chanel
Replica Bell & Ross
Replica Breitling watches
Replica Bvlgari watches
Replica Cartier watches
Replica IWC watches
Replica Longines watches
Replica Movado watches
Replica Omega watches
Replica Oris watches
Replica Panerai watches
Replica Patek Philippe watches
Replica Rolex watches
Replica Seiko watches
Replica Tissot watches
Replica Ulysse Nardin watches
Breitling Replica Watches
Bvlgari Replica Watches
Cartier Replica Watches
Chanel Replica Watches
Gucci Replica Watches
IWC Replica Watches
Longines Replica Watches
Louis Vuitton Replica Watches
swiss replica watches
gift watch
watches gift
luxury watches
louis vuitton handbags
Replica watches
Replica Gucci
Replica Chanel
Replica Bell & Ross
Replica Breitling watches
Replica Bvlgari watches
Replica Cartier watches
Replica IWC watches
Replica Longines watches
Replica Movado watches
Replica Omega watches
Replica Oris watches
Replica Panerai watches
Replica Patek Philippe watches
Replica Rolex watches
Replica Seiko watches
Replica Tissot watches
Replica Ulysse Nardin watches
Breitling Replica Watches
Bvlgari Replica Watches
Cartier Replica Watches
Chanel Replica Watches
Gucci Replica Watches
IWC Replica Watches
Longines Replica Watches
Louis Vuitton Replica Watches
Post a Comment