Friday, September 21, 2007

Wanless is Clueless?

Walk in Centres
A&E 4 hour targets
SHAs
Treatment Centres
Extra bureaucrats and Quangos

Out of Hours Privatisation
Financed via PFI schemes

Modernising Medical Careers and MTAS
Other hairbrained schemes like PBC/C&B
NPfIT/NICE/NHSDirect
Endless reorganisation of the PCTs and health authorities
You get the picture, where has our money really gone?

One could quite easily be forgiven for asking the questions 'What does Sir Dellboy Wanless know about healthcare?' and ' is this another example of the arrogance of those who believe that management and business somehow transcend experience and expertise?'. After all he is a banker (literally - not rhyming slang this time - Ed), and therefore has questionable insight into the danger of extrapolating his experience of bean counting into the measurement of health care 'productivity'. It isn't like the NHS has ever really experienced consensus based or expert lead reorganisation is it? So why is this precursor to yet more pointless organisational jiggery-pokery any different?

Obsessing with health care productivity becomes very similar to a cat chasing its own tail, in that one would be better off ignoring the tail and concentrating on other more pertinent challenges. Interestingly Sir Dellboy managed to ignore all of the above when reporting on billions wasted, very strange that. The pay issue is a convenient scapegoat for this political stooge, no one ever argued that paying staff fairly would increase productivity, it was simply about some kind of justice.

The woeful record on productivity comes about from the endless top down tinkering in the form of the internal market, PFIs, Choose and Book, Reconfiguration of services and management structures et al. This is nothing to do with staff, staff do their best under increasingly difficult and Stalinist circumstances. The top down control freakery in the form of endless targets is no way to improve productivity, it is a way to make political priorities more important than clinical ones, this is not progress.

The way to improve the NHS involves investing in the front line services, treating staff better by trusting them to make sensible clinical decisions, stopping this never ending drive to monitor and measure everything; after all when something becomes measured, you then change the meaning of what you are measuring, a principle this thick regime has never cared to grasp. Again no one has really thought what health productivity means, I strangely get the feeling that our controllers have no real interest in understanding these issues; they have only their selfish interests at heart.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

targets and measurement are routine in the vast majority of well run organisations

however most big organisations would produce crap if left to define success themselves

most good organisations realise that attracting customers of their own free will and keeping them happy is a key metric to measure

the nhs is fucked not because it measures things, or because it sets targets, but because all the improvements are dictated top down, best practise at the branches cannot spread out without the centre first endorsing it, and the biggest problem of all is the end customers have no real say or choice whatsoever leading to lazy self serving bollocks from the providers

turn the nhs into a cheque producing machine giving the patients a cheque when they need service, and let all the providers compete for the cheque from the patient

let the normal dynamics of the patients going somewhere else when they can be seen earlier/later/better/cleaner to take effect and force the crap providers to up their game or close, and let this same dynamic give the best providers more money

let the patients be the deciders of success not the nhs

Dr Grumble said...

Dr Grumble was amused by this from the Northern Rock web site:

The Committee consists of the following Directors under the chairmanship (when present) of Sir Derek Wanless...

It sounds as if he wasn't there much. Too busy telling us what to do. Perhaps he would have been better focussing on the bank.

youdontknowme said...

This is why the government should not control healthcare. How many of our cabinet members were ever doctors or ever even worked in the field of healthcare? None I expect.

I think instead of the government controlling healthcare we should have elected health boards who run the NHS. That will stop the government from fucking up.

Anonymous said...

I must take issue with the comment "no one ever argued that paying staff fairly would increase productivity". Actually, this is exactly what the health minister told the commons select committee on health the new consultant contract would achieve. He argued that the NHS would pay us for a 40 hour week and could buy up to an additional 8 hours of our time, hence increasing productivity. They then costed the contract at around 44 hours per donsultant.

RCP surveys at the time showed that consultants were working around 52 hours per week on average ... so the new contract effectively tried to shave 8 hours off every consultant job.

It's a wonder productivity hasn't actually fallen.

It would have been cheaper by far to give everyone in the NHS a 15% pay rise, a "thank you chaps", ditch the micromanagement, new contract, job planning, A4C, JAQ forms etc - and concentrate on something more productive ...

Herring said...

Two things: 1 what the fuck is "productivity" in the health service? The only useful measure I can think of for a health service is premature deaths/days illness.

2. Badly set targets to bugger things up. I work in IT and I see it all the time. For example: "helpdesk to fix 50% of problems on first phonecall". The result is that you phone, they tell you to reboot, ask if the problem has gone away and if it has, mark it as fixed.

Anonymous said...

swiss replica watches
gift watch
watches gift
luxury watches
louis vuitton handbags
Replica watches
Replica Gucci
Replica Chanel
Replica Bell & Ross
Replica Breitling watches
Replica Bvlgari watches
Replica Cartier watches
Replica IWC watches
Replica Longines watches
Replica Movado watches
Replica Omega watches
Replica Oris watches
Replica Panerai watches
Replica Patek Philippe watches
Replica Rolex watches
Replica Seiko watches
Replica Tissot watches
Replica Ulysse Nardin watches
Breitling Replica Watches
Bvlgari Replica Watches
Cartier Replica Watches
Chanel Replica Watches
Gucci Replica Watches
IWC Replica Watches
Longines Replica Watches
Louis Vuitton Replica Watches

Anonymous said...

Omgea Replica Watches
Oris Replica Watches
Panerai Replica Watches
Patek Philippe Replica
Rado Replica Watches
Swiss Chanel Ceramic Watch
Tissot Replica Watches
Ulysse Nardin Replica
Vacheron Constantin Replica
Breitling Watches Replica
Bvlgari Watches Replica
Cartier Watches Replica
Chanel Watches Replica
Gucci Watches Replica
IWC Watches Replica
Longines Watches Replica
Louis Vuitton Watches Replica
Omgea Watches Replica
Oris Watches Replica
Panerai Watches Replica
Patek Philippe Watches Replica
Rado Watches Replica
Rolex Ladies Watches Replica
Swiss Chanel Ceramic Replica
Tag Heuer Watches Replica
Tissot Watches Replica
Ulysse Nardin Watches Replica
replica Louis Vuitton handbags