
There seems to be a widespread view that the NHS needs reform and that all the current NHS reforms are good, and that only antediluvian “vested producer interests” of doctors, nurses and other unions are holding them back.
To these commentators who all seem to be politicians, health economists or management consultant types reform is a great good in its own right, and all who stand in its way are some combination of:
Lazy
Overpaid
Overprotected
Anti-competition
Anti-choice
Non patient-centred
Slow
Backward
Scared
Self serving
Vested producer interest
Knaves
As Richard Vize, the HSJ editor, puts it, “In the struggle to improve health services the only easy part is finding someone to say 'no'.” Well we’re certainly happy to oblige him with this piece.
Actually I have got news for them. We are none of the above. We think that the current NHS reforms are just WRONG, both IN PRINCIPLE and IN PRACTICE. New Labour has been a total disaster in its running of the NHS and relations are worsening again.
There is a real feeling of us versus them and for all the talk of “clinical engagement” most doctors are ever less involved in service design.
Let’s look at Labour’s record on health:
A fortune has been spent on the NHS.
However, it has not gone on anything sensible such as extra GPs, longer consultations, better access to investigations, speeding up discharge summaries, improved primary-secondary care communications. In short patients still encounter a system working under resource and severe time pressure at every point they meet it. Patients, doctors and other health service staff are run ragged and frazzled, and somehow still keeping a smile on and a service running despite management hindrance and interference. Clinics run late, and get overbooked. Notes are lost, letters get mislaid, or never typed. The doctor-patient consultation is still only a few minutes in an experience that may have taken several hours of travel and waiting. The patients still don’t fully understand what the hospital doctor says and go to the GP only to find that the consultant’s letter is not yet there…4 weeks later.
Admission wards overflow, and back up back into A+E departments. Winter pressures could easily overwhelm most local hospitals. Bed occupancy in UK is appallingly high, and MRSA, and clostridium difficile are rife. Wards are easily closed when there is an outbreak of norovirus. NHS long term care for older or young disabled people has been destroyed and NHS dentistry is becoming rarer, and harder to access. GP premises have been run down, and cost rent scheme stopped.
And the NHS is such a “world class service” that only Cuba has anything like it. But what would Johny Foreigner know?
Where has the money gone?
-On a grandiose computer system- imposed top down, with no regard for confidentiality, or for what would help doctors manage patients better.
-On choose and book- needless, slow, offering the wrong choice at the wrong time
-On reorganisations and structural changes- same old face, nice new desks, nice new titles, bugger all done.
-On management consultants Know alls who know nothing, who have never met a patient and would faint with dread if they did.
-On NHS Direct and NHS 24 Stand apart facilities, drawing money and staff away from other areas. Same money could have been spent on giving GPs more practice nurses and improved phone access to GP surgeries. Nurses could then have worked alongside GPs and used a shared database and so had some background on patients they were speaking too. Would have improved the GP service, made patients lives easier and been safer for patients too.
-On Payment by results (which should really be known as payment per activity) a national tariff system that does not really allow for complexity and case mix.
-On practice based commissioning introduced too late and too timidly to be useful. More slippage announced this week. Likely to be scrapped or renamed soon.
-On appraisal- a system that takes doctors away from front line practice to “reflect”
-On ISTCs ministerial vanity to destabilise local hospitals
-On Mergers- ever larger hospitals- The DGH is now seen as an enemy to be destroyed
-On PCTs the most useless organisations ever invented
-On Walk in centres Useless, and money would have better been spent on improving local GP services or negotiating a deal for commuters to be seen by GPs near their workplace.
-On new contracts that deliver what neither doctors nor patients really want or need.
-On sacking medical secretaries and outsourcing the typing to agencies in India
-On management pet projects rather than locally needed projects
-On competition in what is fundamentally a co-operative and collaborative venture
-On PFI and 'LIFT' projects- the true cost of which was dragged out of a civil servant this week
The key flaw in all the reforms suggested for the NHS over the last 20 years has been the notion of an “Internal Market” It’s a totally flawed analogy, that does not, and never has, matched NHS reality. Any solution based on it is wrong de novo, and the NHS’s record on implementation of anything is a dire warning to other organisations.
So when people say “It’s easy to find people who say NO to reform” Dr Rant shouts back, “Yes, here we are, and we have something valid to say. And we start by saying “NO” to what’s going on now.”









14 comments:
fuck me youre talking sense, whats wrong?
yea we dont need an internal market we need a real one where the PATIENTS control the purse strings
no one
vize's article is staggeringly thick, even for an editorial piece. The assumed notion that if a doctor opposes an action it is probably the right thing to do sums up quite how bad things have become.
I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganizing; and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress while producing confusion, inefficiency, and demoralization.
Said to be by Gaius Petronius around AD66
I agree with you Dr Rant; the money is being squandered on anything but patient care! I hope Tooke's review is amplemented especially re doctor and other health staff role definition so that doctors and nurses go back to to what they do best rather than the current blurring of roles and the mountain of paperwork that is causing a mess in our hospitals. I also hope that Darzi sees sence and stirrs away from wanting to bring the failed american system here.
No to the prvitisation of the NHS
Being a successful trade title is about getting under the skin of your market, according to PPA business and professional magazine editor of the year, Richard Vize.
***********
Richard Vize certainly knows how to get under my skin. Doctors are keen to embrace changes for the better but it's been well-nigh impossible to get arrogant managers to listen to doctors about what would be better. Change for change's sake is just not sensible. It's dangerous even. It's time doctors stood up and said so. We didn't with MMC and MTAS (though we all knew this was a policy for cloud cuckoo land) because we have been cowed by vitriolic attacks against us claiming that we are luddites and protectionists along with sundry other unwarranted and untrue allegations stemming from the likes of Mr Vize. Can he really believe what he has written or is he on some bashing the doctors gravy train?
There are some wonderful turns of phrase in his bizarre article. Right up front is a full blooded attack on the doctor-patient relationship. He sets about 'Exploding the myth that there is something numinous in the relationship between GP and patient..' when everybody knows full well that there is something very special about the GP-patient relationship which has nothing to gain from the Asdas, Tescos and Virgins of this world.
Why for goodness sake does he laud the PCT for being 'gutsy'? We need less not more of mindless bludgeoning management. That's what has led to all the new NHS money being squandered.
This nonsensical article needs to be exposed for the bare-faced lie that it patently is.
Part of the problem is the inability of politicians and quango types to pay heed to the old engineering adage “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it”. They want to make their mark and if ends up in a giant cock up they just walk a way denying all responsibility and blaming someone else or just claiming an unmitigated success.
My nap for the next major balls up near you is the proposed demolition of the old Victorian town centre prisons to be replaced with small “community prisons” presumably in the suburbs and/or industrial estates.
That, oldgit, is an interesting point. I have been looking at the PCT's web site to try and find out exactly what it is that might be broke and might need fixing. Apparently patients have been finding it difficult to get through to their GP's practice by phone. So the PCT has been phoning GPs up to 10 times a week to check if the phone gets answered. There's a link on this page to the results. They don't look that bad to me. But perhaps having worked for the NHS for many years my standards are too low. I can't find any other documentation to show that anything else is broke in their patch. So why are they fixing it?
If things are so bad that something radical needs to be forced through we really should be told what the problem is.
Long ago and far away I worked for the Department of Health. I recall an administrator telling me that doctors shouldn't be involved in making policy because their experience of working in the NHS meant that they were biased. The preferable alternative seemed to be to use his own unbiased views.
It's not that doctors are biased- of course we are.
The madness comes as DH and its minions pretend not to be biased.
Well for a start lets get rid of GPwSI and let GP's return to looking after their patients and allow real consultants to handle the tricky work!
we dont need an internal market we need a real one where the PATIENTS control the purse strings
*************
This may actually happen according to these quotes from David Nicholson:
'I think we will see a move towards [giving] more individual budgets to people - individual allocations of resources, either yearly resource or episodic resource.'
Mr Nicholson said he anticipated this would lead to the development of 'brokerage'. Organisations could bring people together to buy services on their behalf. 'I think we will see that and that we should encourage that development.'
Darzi's minions are steamrollering his plan through. It doesn't seem as if the views of patients are being respected.
swiss replica watches
gift watch
watches gift
luxury watches
louis vuitton handbags
Replica watches
Replica Gucci
Replica Chanel
Replica Bell & Ross
Replica Breitling watches
Replica Bvlgari watches
Replica Cartier watches
Replica IWC watches
Replica Longines watches
Replica Movado watches
Replica Omega watches
Replica Oris watches
Replica Panerai watches
Replica Patek Philippe watches
Replica Rolex watches
Replica Seiko watches
Replica Tissot watches
Replica Ulysse Nardin watches
Breitling Replica Watches
Bvlgari Replica Watches
Cartier Replica Watches
Chanel Replica Watches
Gucci Replica Watches
IWC Replica Watches
Longines Replica Watches
Louis Vuitton Replica Watches
Omgea Replica Watches
Oris Replica Watches
Panerai Replica Watches
Patek Philippe Replica
Rado Replica Watches
Swiss Chanel Ceramic Watch
Tissot Replica Watches
Ulysse Nardin Replica
Vacheron Constantin Replica
Breitling Watches Replica
Bvlgari Watches Replica
Cartier Watches Replica
Chanel Watches Replica
Gucci Watches Replica
IWC Watches Replica
Longines Watches Replica
Louis Vuitton Watches Replica
Omgea Watches Replica
Oris Watches Replica
Panerai Watches Replica
Patek Philippe Watches Replica
Rado Watches Replica
Rolex Ladies Watches Replica
Swiss Chanel Ceramic Replica
Tag Heuer Watches Replica
Tissot Watches Replica
Ulysse Nardin Watches Replica
replica Louis Vuitton handbags
Post a Comment