
The Government are a bunch of cunts.
No, that is too restrained. They are a collection of duplicitous cunts; reneging cunts; lying cunts; and utter fucking cunt-slime of the most dishonest kind imaginable.
And they are cunts who hate doctors. At every stage of a doctors career, New Labour has introduced barriers and obstacles to fuck them over.
Fresh A-level students now have to sit a 'clinical aptitude test' which was forcibly implemented to select candidates, despite the fact it never worked.
The syllabus of a medical degree has lost the core subjects of anatomy, physiology and pathology, to be replaced by the touchy-feely bollocks approaches of 'communication', so that doctors can now empathically tell relatives that their loved-ones have died due to the fact that they fucked up the surgery / internal medicine / disease management.
MTAS came along and bent a generation of doctors over a barrel, and fucked their present and future careers firmly up the arse.
And then came along the GP and Consultant contracts.
The government thought that doctors spend half their working hours on the golf-course, and wanted to get more work out of them, so entered into negotiations about performance related contracts.
Doctors realised that most of them worked 100+ hours per week, and despite the views of the conservative former health secretary, Kenneth Clarke, most of them didn't know one end of a golf club from another. And so the new contracts were born.
GPs received a pay rise, albeit it performance related. They were given the option of opting out of Out-Of-Hours (OOH), albeit for a massive pay cut. And GPs were allowed to choose whether they would do work not specified in their contract; roles like removing sutures and dressings applied by the local hospital could either be returned to the place that applied them, or charged for.
Things started to go wrong for the government when almost every GP decided to take a massive pay cut (£6,000) rather than take part in OOH. GPs found that OOH was a massively abused service. Whereas few GPs would object to visiting a patient with an attack of angina, OOH was mainly used by people wanting antibiotics for viral illnesses, or a letter for the council or for court. And so, like a shitty stain, GPs washed their hands of it.
Then came the Quality Outcomes Framework (QoF) results. Most GPs scored very highly, reaching targets for the management of chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular and respiratory illnesses. QoF was all about performance related pay, and high scoring GPs were paid accordingly.
Of course, the government ended up fucking up the contract. In thinking that GPs spent all their time on the golf course, they hadn't realised that well educated, highly motivated professionals would reach most of the targets.
And so, the government mission of fucking over GPs began.
First came the attack on pensions. Rather than pay the employer contribution part of a GPs pension, the government paid it into the GPs wages. And then announced it as a massive pay rise. And then taxed it.
Then came the attack on GP wages. Rather than take the approach of telling the public that GPs spent all their time playing golf, New Labour delighted itself by telling the public that all GPs were paid £250,000 per annum, and wouldn't open nights. Well, a typical salaried GP earns £60,000 per year, and a GP partner is given just over £100,000 per year to run his small business, which includes rent, staff wages, professional costs and pension, before he can afford to pay his own wages. And by their own figures, 84% of the UK population were happy with GP opening hours and current OOH services.
And then came the two highly generous pay rises. Yes, rather than the below inflation pay rises that most public sector workers got, GPs were awared 0% and 0% over the last two years.
And it continues. The latest act of the government is to openly flout the terms of the GP contract. Rather than renegotiate the contract, they have decided to ignore it.
The fuckwits in government have decided the most important health policy to force through is changes to GP opening hours, without paying for it.
If is bad enough that the spineless cowards in the BMA were prepared to offer two extra unpaid hours per week for every 6000 patients on a GP list.
But the government want more. Much more. They want three hours per 6000 patients, in longer blocks, and they want to re-allocate some of the QOF points to make them based on OOH, too.
It may not sound like much. But this will cost the average GP practice over £36,000 per year in terms of both unpaid work, and employing support staff.
Well, New Labour - Merry fucking Christmas, you fucking Scrooges. In order to get yourselves re-elected, you are destroying General Practice. Utterly and Completely. You seem to think that GPs should alter their opening times to suit the few who demand OOH care, rather than the majority who need it, the elderly, the young, and the disabled.
The jewel in the crown of the NHS was the continuity of care that primary care could provide. New Labour wants to replace this jewel with a turd; this turd being an amalgamation of walk-in centres, Polyclinics, NHS direct, community noctors, and all other forms of faeces devised to turn GPs from the gatekeeper of primary care into a politically expedient wage-slave.
It is time for a fight. Not the kind of leaflet campaign that the fucktards running the BMA would probably recommend. It is time for GPs to take the offensive.
There are many ways to do this. There is the "Don't use Choose and Book / NHS-IT" approach, refusing to use the poorly-functional NHS computer systems, which have cost more than the 2012 Olympics. There is the "Refer everything" approach, which could fill outpatient and A+E departments in days, as GPs refer every case that they are not 100% certain of, to ensure patients get as many possible opinions as possible. And there are other approaches, including the above, which would not be considered industrial action, which would thoroughly fuck-up the government's 18-week targets.
And there is the "let's do what the dentists did and fuck off" approach, for GPs who are not anchored by PFI/PCT contracts to pay the mortgage or rent on their surgeries.
There is of course, the all-out 'have a strike' approach, which will fail due to a combination of New Labour spinmongering and BMA cowardice, and the fact that most GPs have patient interests at heart.
However, New Labour will not get the whimpering capitulation that they are after. If they want a fight, they will get one, and it is their nose that shall be bloodied.
And they can get it seen to in one of their fucking Polyclinics.









31 comments:
One of the most succinct and ballsy run-down of New Cunt-bours destruction of the NHS.
As you say, doctors need to fight. Unfortunately, this government is succeeding on destroying the "allied team" of all healthcare workers towards a common goal - erm The Fucking Patient.
They have capitalised on the "us-and-them" attitude held by a bitter cohort of non-doctor workers, who - like our cunty government - believe that a medical degrees = Golf Playing, Arrogant and To Be Ignored.
We are being phased out by (let's face it, cheaper-to-run and cheaper-to-train) "Mocktors" who accuse us of arrogance at the notion that a thorough MEDICAL training might best equip one for its practice.
Expensive, lengthy and fucking arduous though it might be.
If there are any non-medical healthcare workers who, like me, feel neither superior or inferior to anyone else in a hospital, please stand up and be counted.
Everyone who bothers to drag their arse out of bed to do their NHS job* is fucking VALUABLE. Whatever your role is - IT MATTERS A LOT. So why does no-one value themselves enough to do their OWN fucking job well anymore?
Well, this is just the fucking start. . . The BMA, Darzi, New-Fucking-Labour; your fucking cards are marked. We'll fight you to the death. And it won't be ours: we're paying in for BUPA already.
*Unless you're management. In which case you can kiss my lily white arse, you bottom-feeding cunt.
Seems the UKCAT is especially useless this year.
"Medical schools have been told to ignore results from a test taken by 20,000 applicants this year after the examiners decided too many scored high marks. Scores achieved in the "abstract reasoning" exam, worth a quarter of the marks in the UK Clinical Aptitude test (UKCAT), have been ditched after problems were identified by exams company Pearson Vue."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,2229541,00.html
Medical students scoring highly in what is essentially an IQ test? Who could have predicted such a thing!
“We live in a society of victimization, where people are much more comfortable being victimized than actually standing up for themselves.”
********************
... and about the link in your piece:
“We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle”
Churchill
Great portrayal of Nu-Laba's latest attempt to ruin quality patient care.
What's more, it's written in a lingo the average punter will be fluent in. Well done!
"In order to get yourselves re-elected, you are destroying General Practice."
And they're STILL not going to get elected again. Ever. Not that anything will change under Prime Minister C.A.Moron ...
But don't take it so personally doc. It's just your turn to be fucked over, that's all. We lower classes have all been comprehensively trashed, and now the cunts are working there way up through the social layers. They've reached you, that's all (and incidentally, the reason you don't get much support from lower down the heap is because you didn't give said support TO lower down the heap when we were getting it in the neck).
And it didn't start in 1997 - it started in 1979. It accelerated in 1997. You just didn't notice it before 97, that's all.
For all the talk of a two-tier society, we still haven't quite reached it. When it does arrive, the top tier will be politicians, senior civil servants, lawyers, accountants, big-businessmen. The lower tier will be the rest of us. Hell, the fucktards are so cock-sure of themselves that they've even started fucking-over the cops and the forces. This will become a rock-solid two-caste caste system. Everyone will be born into the tier they're going to have to spend their whole lives in.
NOW are we starting to understand Pastor Neimoller?
...their ...
They hate the Nurses more. Doctors are simply being abused while RN's are being abused and slaughtered.
Look, you can swear as much as you like, and I'm sure you're very clever at it.
What part of the phrase "market forces" or "bringing it upon yourselves" don't you understand? GP Principals have been laughing all the way to the bank recently, employing cheap salaried GPs as sevice provision, and raking in a tidy profit. And 85% voted yes. You have no-one to blame but yourselves.
A Dr, not a GP.
Dear anon,
Market forces simply do not have any meaning in a closed market, ie Primary care. Opening OOH centre and walk in centres does not change this it just makes the work on the ground harder for GPs.
Ranty seems to forget that GPs are "self-employed private contractors" - not my words, those of HM Government, and if they don't deliver what's required why shouldn't healthcare companies operate in competition with these dinosaurs? I can't wait for it to happen. If I had the option of seeing a GP service owned by BUPA, I'd be first in the queue. It won't happen in my lifetime though, the medical profession is still far too powerful a political force to allow this. Maybe it will happen in years to come when 70% of the medical profession are female and working part-time.
David, it's amazing, BUPA keep all the really good GP's for themselves...and dish out ABX for viral illnesses so your all set.
I mean look at all the things you can get from a private GP you can't from any other...oh wait you can't get anything more.
The thing you mihgt want is private medical insurance for all the things the GP mihgt want you to get (investigations/ physio/ talk therapy) but has to refer you via the PCT with its long waits.
ladies and gentlemen,
i do actually sympathise with a lot of what you are saying, i couldnt agree more with much of what you are saying, however you are making a few basic mistakes
primary care has not been a jewel in the crown anytime in my 40 odd year lifetime, it maybe pretty ok is some parts of the country, in the inner cities, on the big council estates, in the worst PCTS, is some parts of rural UK, primary care is frankly shit, as you Dr Rants dam well know if you only opened your hearts and admitted it
as for 84 % of patients being "happy" with current opening hours arrangements, we all know how fucked up ALL govt stats are regarding the health business, and this is one which fails to recognise the total disgust at the current inability to get access to a medic by many of the most hard working deserving cases in the country
as ever much of this is due to the total disconnect between customer needs, hopes and desires and the providers, in the case of GPs often your good selfs, we have in between the inefficient madarins of government and admin wallahs
you would really have winning arugments if you took on board some of the real concern from patients at how crap the service can be from the health buisness in the uk, and these im afraid include lack of access out of hours etc
the docs and the patients really could work it all out much better left to our own devices, probably needing a negotiating device like m o n e y, much better than the overhead of governement sticking its thumb in the pie
anyways i understand your frustrations, but your not half as frustrated as many of a patient depending on this shit service to keep them alive, and in many cases letting them die when they would easily live long and old in other western nations
no one
Anonymous
I think you are right on this. We've said before that closing the PCTs down would probably improve function and morale within the NHS.
Nick Seddon's new book for Citias is making interesting reading-I'll review it when I have finished it.
Happy New Year to all our readers and respondents.
And Bah Humbug to Brown, Donaldson, and others who hopefully will demit office or otherwise "transition" in 2008.
I'm afraid GPs do have an image problem which the Nulabour spinmeisters have exploited and the media have swallowed. It has chosen to fight over the issue of extended hours because it knows it will win. If GPs don't agree to do it all the more reason to open up a shiney polyclinic and staff it with nurses. You are playing into their hands.
As the non-GP Dr above has pointed out, GPs also have a reputation of climbing over their dying mothers oxygen line if there is money to be had. Sure its only a tiny minority - like the tiny minority of Hospital Consultants who play golf but in my area GPs are employing doctor's assistants (Noctors) instread of partners. These people are permitted to do just about everything a GP does at a much lower cost. If GPs are happy to defraud the public over access to real GPs then it's difficult to blame the government for doing the same.
We have to maintain our own high standards and we have to tell everyone who wants to listen our side of the argument to counter the Nulabour spin machine. There are 1.3 million people working in the NHS and they have families and friends. We can give Nulabour a nasty dose of the clap next election time if they persist in having us over a barrel.
Happy New Year Dr Rant Team and all your readers
as for 84 % of patients being "happy" with current opening hours arrangements, we all know how fucked up ALL govt stats are regarding the health business
I would remind you that this was the government's own survey, costing millions, with a question worded to encourage the answer the government wanted - that access needed improving and GPs needed to be open more. Even with all that, the majority of people said they were happy.
Well said Dr Rant........100% as it is.........we need the Politics out of the NHS or it will not be celebrating it's 60th Birthday......You guys need to take action in some form and need to be in solidarity......the public will support you but you need to word your action properly......the elderly and vulnerable and the majority value healthcare but the "thatcher generation" don't value it they expect it as a right not a priveledge, so decide your action and contact the Save Hinchingbrooke Campaign as they had it right and full public support
These three Rants and their associated comments seem to crystallise exactly where Primary Care is at, the crisis facing it (complete destruction of its current form) and the opposing camps trying to influence this. There are the GPs themselves who are frustrated that the Government is riding roughshod over their "contract" while mouthing off about what patients allegedly want; Nu-lab power-crazed politicians who see a chnace to "smash" a profession who've long been a thorn in their side and get in their inexplicably favoured private PLC mates to have a piece of public pie; Cheer-leaders for the 24/7 "want it NOW" section of society like "no-one" who have identified that the beaurocracy is in the way of everything from access to hospital cleanliness but think that wholesale privatisation is the answer; then there are those that see it as symptomatic of the whole shoddy mess of Brown Government, and finally the two groups who are symtpomatic of the reason the clunknig fist (and his predecessors) are getting away with it - nurses who are rightly aggrieved at their lot and consequently have no sympathy for GPs, and other doctors who feel likewise. The problem is that no matter what good sensible argument is advanced, these positions are all pretty entrenched and if I, as a Gp partner in a semi-rural dispensing practice say ANYTHING about this, those entrenched can dismiss it as venal self-interest! Hence General Practice is ever split, un-supported by allied Health-care professionals and vilifed by lay press and commentators, and the real tragedy is overlooked or dismised as alarmist.
The one voice not being heard here is the one which has most to lose - the elderly and the vulnerable who WILL suffer under the fragmented, poly-clincal, semi-privatised nightmare that we are careering towards. I'm sorry, "no-one" if the current state of play means you cannot get your routine medical problems dealt with at 8.30 pm on a Sunday, but the price to be paid for giving you that really IS the extermination of a system which works pretty damn well, no matter what the Daily Mail says, which could work better if it was less politically tinkered with, and which, for indiscernible political gain is being run into the buffers by a bunch of politicians with not one clue what really goes on in General Practice. I often get cross with the BMA for appearing to care more about preserving the NHS than looking out for its constituent doctors, but on this one it is right to do so, and our campaign must focus on the helath problems that will ensue if these policies are pursued. The problem is that all evidence points ot no-one believing them until it's too late
But the question is... what are we going to do?
drchris said...
But the question is... what are we going to do?
Ask Dr Rita Pal to help. She has all the answers.
Re "the elderly and the vulnerable who WILL suffer" they are already suffering badly, very badly indeed, and probably much worse than you realise if you have not been round our inner city health providers recently, and they are exactly the reason i get most pissed off with the shit nhs, there is nothing to defend - the status quo is the worst health provision in the western world
re "price to be paid for giving you that really IS the extermination of a system which works pretty damn well" er it doesnt work pretty dam well at all, except in small isolated parts of the country for folk in very specific subgroups of the population, the nhs fails to address large sections of the population, those that move address frequently, those on their own, those who work, those who have trouble travelling, i could go on, there are large parts of the country where for many people there really is no nhs in practise for anything other than an A & E admission after a car crash - and even that is 3rd world
and yes we need GP appointments when its convinient for the working population and the business of the country, not the fucking unmarried mothers centric service we have at the moment
so fuck you, you misrepresent almost everything i stand for, you will loose the argument in the long run, cos there is no remnant of good in the nhs it can fucking die for all i care, i care about the health and well being of the people of this country not some fucking dinosar of an organisation and left wing nutter supporters
yes we need health provision safety net provision, this can and is done much more efficiently in other western nations, this does not mean we need an nhs
go an look at how other countries do it ! and not the usa for fucks sake
no one
the fragmented, poly-clincal, semi-privatised nightmare that we are careering towards.
The GP service is private. It was never non-privatized. Part of what the government proposes is this: competition in the provision of GP- and GP-type services. Fragmented, well, GP/GP-type service is already fragmented, as of the GP opt-out responsibility for OOH care (resulting, often, in surgeries being open for a maximum of 4.5 days a week and operating a same-day only, ring at 8.30 that day, and fuck you if you need to take a child to school or travel to work at that time). (Please don't say, as some commenters here who allege they're doctors say, 'anyone who needs to see a GP is too ill to go to work'.)
Let's remind ourselves of the immediate casus belli. The government offered GPs a deal (details to be quibbled over... )
for opening surgeries for a full three hours more a week (opening expenses paid). The GPC offered just two hours, i.e. said no. So the government will, it alleges -- I say 'alleges' because this may be sabre-rattling -- impose extended opening hours without the offered money to fund it i.e. without the money to hire receptionists etc.. And some GPs, perhaps also sabre- rattling, perhaps genuinely enraged, will, they say, fight the three hours/the extra one hour to the last ditch. (I.e. they'll vote Cameron next time.)
I admit I'm not sure how the government can impose the change (given that GPs are self-employed private contractors who, as 'Dr Crippen' said more than once, can't be told to do anything, have to be paid to do something 'new' like diagnose/control high blood pressure... ; so that, while other professions required to introduce appraisal schemes simply introduced them, GPs were paid to do it), except, of course, by requiring GPs to tender competitively against private sector groups who are likely to offer extended hours...
Is there a better way of offering a more flexible GP system? Perhaps. People could be allowed to register with a GP near their workplace as well as near their home, and GPs could offer the kind of flexible appointments system my GPs offer. But I sense there will be a more radical change than this partly because of the Thatcherism and 'private good, public bad'-ism that haunts Labour now, partly because this country probably can't afford the highest paid GPs in Europe (higher paid than their US counterparts, probably, now), partly because there are instances where walk-in centres are the answer, partly, illogically, because while most people are, apparently, happy with their GPs' opening hours, there's significant discontent about OOH services.
I have a genuine question here: Where will the GPs come from who will end up working for (for example) Virgin Primary Care Services Plc? Will they be existing partners or salaried/freelance GPs who will prefer to work shifts/weekends, or will they be doctors from abroad? I am genuinely interested to hear the answer to this.
I think they will be "sessional functionaries robotically following guidelines" as Raymond Tallis describes in Hippocratic Oaths.
They may well be pliable, sessional workers, who will come and go as needed.
They are unlikely to be long term workers in settled practices.
Virgin et al are unlikely to want to take on a fully featured GP service, or to attempt any business that targets all comers. (businesses usually talk about their niches, and their areas of expertise- the idea of general anything terrifies most businesses.)
But getting a young doctor and asking him to see some commuters with sniffles could be presented as a service.
"Where will the GPs come from who will end up working for (for example) Virgin Primary Care Services Plc?"
Who said anything about doctors working in these centres? At best there only needs to be a doctor nominally in charge and that could be covering a number of centres.
Yes, but what I don't understand is that if private companies will now be allowed to tender to supply daytime primary care services, then they will HAVE to provide a comparable service, i.e. will NEED doctors to work there in similar numbers to general practice currently. Where will these doctors come from? If we all refuse to work for such companies then it is a non-starter for them surely?
if private companies will now be allowed to tender to supply daytime primary care services,
they are now and have already taken over some practices (ChilversMcRea, owned by two GPs, has taken some over.) So, yes, who are the blackleg salaried doctors working for them**? And what about booting Chilvers and McRea out of the profession**?
(**assuming ChilversMcRea were awarded the practices for no good reason.)
OK sorry, ChilversMcRea is one GP and a not-doctor.
not-doctor is that the full form of "noctor", Jayann ;o)
You got it, a & e charge nurse! :)
I see "Mocktor" Sarah Chilvers refers to itself as a "clinician".
Whatever next!
Does anyone know the answer to my original question, i.e. where will all the GPs come from to work for these private companies competing to provide day time primary care? I am just interested.
Post a Comment