Prof Elizabeth 'My Love for Carol Black will last a thousand years' Paice appears to be urging a return to 1930s GMC rules which saw doctors struck off for extramarital affairs. Look out Needham! [Image courtesy of Dr Wayne]
Doctors rally for right to call UK.gov quangonista a 'sh*t'
A spokeswoman for the London Deanery said today: "From our point of view it was a very minor incident. [Professor Paice] acted in accordance with the General Medical Council's good practice guidance."
The spokeswoman said Paice made no recommendation as to how the Highland Deanery should react to Dr Scot Jr's posting, and speculated that there may be more to the suspension than publicly known.
It's a minor fucking incident for the London deanery? I guess it's all a matter of perspective. Clearly the London deanery subscribe to the Mel Brooks school of empathy: tragedy is when I stub my toe, comedy is when you fall down an open manhole and die. If anything screams 'we are not fit to be in charge of junior doctors' careers', this does.
However, it gets worse. Not only do they try and smear Dr Junior by suggesting that there is more to this (the classic 'we know things you don't, so be a nice chap and run along' approach so beloved of unelected, unaccountable pricks the NHS over), but they then repeat the lie that Liz Fish has been using since the start: '[Professor Paice] acted in accordance with the General Medical Council's good practice guidance'.
No, she did not. Apparently Lizzy does not understand the GMC advice in full. Firstly, swearing away from work is like adultery. It is something that got people struck off as 'unprofessional' in the 1930s. Fortunately for Liz's pal, Prof Needham, the appearance of being a 'home wrecker' is no longer grounds for a GMC investigation. Neither, thankfully for Dr Scot Junior, is using naughty words about a political aparachnick. We all know which we'd rather be caught doing, but neither is a GMC offence.
Secondly, Prof Paice is NOT a colleague of ours. She is a political figure and does not get the 'being respectful of a colleague' defence.
Thirdly, GMC advice is quite clear: you must follow normal channels if you have a problem with what a doctor says in the media. Liz did not do this. (See NHS Exposed items passim*)
Does Professor Paice think she is above the law? Does she think the law only applies to her? Does she think that GMC advice only works one way?
Elizabeth Paice is the one that has acted unprofessionally. She failed to follow GMC advice. She is a colleague of Dr Scot Junior (and Prof Needham certainly is - in fact they have a duty of care towards him as Deans), and it is the two Deans that failed to treat Dr Scot Junior with respect.
Thankfully, Rita Pal has already referred them to the GMC. I'd suggest that Liz stops lying in the press. Unless, of course, she can just get her pal Dame Carol 'I'm That Huge Shit on Every Quango Going' Black to use her position in the GMC to make it all go away.
What a shower of cunts.
* And the following blogs for more info:
1. Jobbing Doctor
2. Witch Doctor
3. Ward 87
Dr Rant
Dr Cardigan
Dr Blue
Dr Brown
Rev Dr Green
Dr Mustard
Mr Orange
Dr Pink
Dr Purple
Mr Salmon
Dr White
Mr Beige
Ms Scarlet
Dr Informed
Posts
7 comments:
:) Nice one babe. Thanks for linking to us.
Dr Wayne is superb. Intelligent and talented.
RP
NHS Exposed
NHS Exposed Blog
Ward87
meanwhile the nhs provides shit care to the patients
and the debate re replacing the whole fucking lot with a state backed medical insurance scheme is uncommented on, which of course would incentivise the providers to thin down the political layers and make the whole thing more responsive to real patients needs
http://notdrrant.blogspot.com/
Dear Rant, I attempted to leave a word or two of support for Scot Junior on his local rag's website, but unfortunately 'pruning twat flaps' is not acceptable language in the presbyterian far north. Suprisingly neither is the more technical 'remodelling labia minora'. But I want him to know I tried.
No-one, I would like to take this opportunity to tell you to "fuck off". Not because I disagree with you, but just because I can. Your solution, while superficially attractive, much like Scot Jnr's best work on lady-parts, in practice it is unworkable as the proposed system would lack erectility and have substantially reduced sensitivity.
opps. I meant to say "...system would not provide sufficient stability for the 10 - 15 years of training that a doctor would need to be trusted with your wife's pudendum". Neither would it allow for long term strategic planning. Unless of course you'd trust Enron Health Care to sort it out. Don't get me wrong, the private mental hospitals I've been in, are absolutely super. I'd like every patient to be able to play croquet in the afternoon [Even the one's in IC], and have the prettiest Austrian nurse. Unfortunately we live in the real world. Well you do. I'm away with the [BUPA] Faeries.
Socrates it works in many other countries, and medical education continues a pace in those countries, and guess what they dont have substandard shit care in those countries either
so all in all i find you argument in defence of the crap nhs baseless
Ah yes! The good ole US of A. I know, cheap shot, but I couldn't help myself. In my more florid psychotic episodes, I too believe that privatising the NHS would be beneficial, but then the nice young men, in their clean white coats arrive and pump my botton full of Somnabulon and I get over it. The solution is to have doctors run the NHS, in the way academics run universities.
Post a Comment