tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28089527.post-25781762837378222822008-04-05T02:52:00.000+01:002008-04-05T02:52:00.000+01:002008-04-05T02:52:00.000+01:00The fact that the research was published in the BMJ does not mean it is any good.<BR/><BR/>The research is shit. It looks at 'patient satisfaction'. Exactly what relevence does 'patient satisfaction' with their care have?<BR/><BR/>Do patients have any fucking idea how good the care was?<BR/><BR/>How do patients judge the quality of care?<BR/><BR/>I would suggest that they base their 'satisfaction' on how much time was spent on them and how nice the person spending the time with them was.<BR/><BR/>Save me from stupid fucking morons who think that this kind of total fucking shit research somehow shows nurses are safe at diagnosing illness.<BR/><BR/>(Which reminds me of the research on how degree nurses are safer than the old-style diploma nurses - I looked it up and it is just as shit.)<BR/><BR/>Dogma, PC, bullshit, dangerous, fucking pile of wank.Dr Ranthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03564231420965979362noreply@blogger.com